There’s a drawer in my imaginary desk where I keep drafts of unsent emails and responses to conversations never uttered. Not from forgetfulness, but from choice or lack of readiness. You know, those responses that only emerge after the exact moment when they should have emerged?

I call this phenomenon “delayed intelligence.” There are situations and/or people that suck out and subtract our intelligence, only allowing it to resurface after we’ve left the moment when we were supposed to retort with the biting, precise, definitive argument that would have left us triumphant. These are conversations that needed to exist but not necessarily to happen. Elaborate responses to provocations, confessions too raw, questions whose answers I might prefer not to know.

This drawer has become a peculiar cemetery where I bury communicative impulses. Each paper, physical or digital equivalent, represents a moment when the urgency to say something collided with the wisdom or stupidity that silences. In any case, they’re monuments to restraint, small victories over the tyranny of immediate expression our era so celebrates. It’s important to learn to distinguish restraint from submission. The silences they produce are different.

We’re told communication is always good, that expressing what we feel is healthy, that transparency is virtue, that it’s the filters created by others, by the system, that silence us. But there are violences in total honesty, cruelties in absolute transparency. Not every truth needs to be spoken, not every thought deserves voice. The unspoken has its own weight, its own eloquence.

In a team meeting, someone proposes a manifestly bad idea. I see in the faces around the table the same silent recognition. No one speaks. The silence thickens until someone, diplomatically, suggests “exploring other options.” Everyone breathes relief. We’ve preserved something supposedly more valuable than truth: the possibility of continuing to work together.

Unspoken words accumulate like sediment at the bottom of a river. Over time, they transform the morphology of our relationships. There are friendships defined more by what we never said than by what we shared. There are loves that survive precisely because certain words remained in the drawer.

Of course there’s pathology in excessive silence, in the inability to confront what must be confronted. But we live obsessed with the opposite extreme—compulsive expression, constant sharing, obsessive documentation of every fleeting thought.

We forget that silence is also a form of care, that there’s generosity in keeping to ourselves what would only serve to wound. More than silence, “not knowing” has become proscribed, given the value of knowing something. How one knows what one knows matters less than knowing something, even if that something is not worth knowing.

The drawer continues to fill. Occasionally, I reread some of these texts and smile—at the catastrophe avoided, at the accidental wisdom of procrastination. They’re reminders that not everything that can be said should be said.

The link has been copied!